11. Why border disputes tend to be the most intractable (stubborn) in
international relations?

Border disputes tend to be the most intractable (stubborn) in  international relations because

1. They can easily result in wars

2. The audience in the two parties are keenly interested in the matter

3. Promoters of the conflict tend to have a rigid stance on the issue.

4. The disputes are a threat to the identities of the nations involved.

5. The disputes could also affect the trade between the nations and other regions.

Explanation:

Border disputes are disputes between two or more nations over the right to a particular territory. Contenders tend to have firm reasons as to why they believe the territory is their right. This makes it harder to resolve such conflicts. The issues are very volatile and if not well managed can easily result in wars. The nations also feel that their identities are at stake, so they would do anything to protect their territories.

Income that comes from these territories might be lost if the case is lost. For these reasons, border disputes are the most intractable in international relations.

answer: the purpose of the "index of forbidden books" was to prevent the contamination of the faith or the corruption of morals of roman catholics according to canon law, through the reading of theologically mistaken or immoral books. the condemnation of published books, thus listed in the index librorum prohibitorum.

explanation: index librorum prohibitorum, (latin: “index of forbidden books”), list of books once forbidden by roman catholic church authority as dangerous to the faith or morals of roman catholics. publication of the list ceased in 1966, and it was relegated to the status of a historic document.

the 20th and final edition appeared in 1948, and the index was formally abolished on 14 june 1966 by pope paul vi. the aim of the list was to protect the faith and morals of the faithful by putting a stop to the reading of theologically, culturally, and politically disruptive books.