subject
History, 20.11.2020 18:00 jbainbynn1296

Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blog posts can never be used as secondary sources, even if written by credible authors or posted on acceptable websites such as .gov or .org websites. No, blog posts should not be used as secondary sources because it is difficult to establish the credibility of the authors as they are often biased and do not always use facts. Yes, blog posts can always be used because they are either a primary or secondary source, and credibility concerns are secondary to the type of source. Yes, even if this information is biased, blog posts can be used as primary sources if balanced by facts, reasoned judgments, and analysis by more credible sources.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:00
The north gained control of the northern part of the mississippi river once grant captured the city a. memphis b.vicksburg c. chattanooga
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
The byzantine empire weakened after asia minor
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:20
As a religious faith, candomblé appropriates beliefs from both a. african faiths and catholicism b. hinduism and catholicism c. hinduism and islam d. buddhism and catholicism
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:50
On which point did william lloyd garrison and frederick douglass disagree?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.07.2021 22:30
question
Mathematics, 23.07.2021 22:30
question
Computers and Technology, 23.07.2021 22:40
Questions on the website: 13722361