Floal Exam Prompta You must answer one prompt from each of the three sections below Please write the number of each prompt dearly in your submission Expectations Your response to each essay should have a clear thesis. Your thesis should be supported with specific evidence from the historical contexts and cases discussed in class. diatabuted Supreme Court opinions, course texts, and supplemental readings (where appropriate) Your responses will be graded on the quality and development of your thesis and evidence Each response should be roughly five paragraphs in length it is my expectation that you will rely on course material (assigned texts, case excerpts, and class lectures/discussions) To that end, I would recommend against citing outside information You MUST anawer the following prompt from Section 1: 1. Evaluate the importance of HISTORICAL CONTEXT In ONE of the following cases: • Korematsu v United States (1944) Dennis v United States (1951) • Brown v Board of Education (1954) • Yates v. United States (1957) Roumediene v Bush (2008) You MUST answer ONE of the following from Section 2 2. To what extent did the Supreme Court's interpretation of the commerce clause protect American workers from the abuses by American industry? (Incorporate both the Gilded Age and the New Deal in your response. Reference at least THREE cases in your response ) 3. Should the New Deal be considered a legal success? (Reference at least THREE cases in your response ) You MUST answer ONE of the following from Section 3. 4. Compare the Constitutionality of the use of military commissions to try detainees in World War II and the Global War on Terror Edit 5. Evaluate the validity of the following statement in the context of the Cold War Contine