In one or two paragraphs, describe one way in which the elastic clause is positive for the country, and one way it could be considered negative. Then, explain whether you believe Congress is correct to use
this clause to obtain powers that are not specifically listed in the Constitution. Be sure to explain why
you feel this way.

Its good bc conngress can make nessasary laws its bad bc conngress might abuse this power for personal gain,

Explanation:

I already explained it haah

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.

though africans landed with few possessions, they carried their cultures, skills, and spiritual worldviews into the americas. wherever african religions took root in the new world, africans and their descendants changed and adapted their belief systems to local circumstances and influences. individual circumstances created variations in the way people practiced their faiths, what they believed, and what significance it held for their lives.

explanation:

mark brainliest!