subject
History, 17.11.2020 02:30 bracefacer42

Where did people move to as the Sahara desert expanded?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:10
Which allied leader is described below? • his actions at the peace conference reflected the desire of the english people to punish germany for the destruction and suffering of world war i • he believed germany had to be punished for world war i, but not to the extent that germany was left powerless and destitute • he wanted germany to serve as a barrier to resist the spread of communism. woodrow wilson david lloyd george georges clemenceau vittorio orlando next question o ask for turn it in
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:10
All of the following are true of humanism during the renaissance except a. it was a new way of looking at the world c. it focused on religion b. it caused ancient roman and greek texts to become popular d. it dealt with emotion
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Which statement can be said to be true after examining this map? (1 point) christianity remained popular in egypt after 400 ad. christianity was the only religion in the roman empire until 476 ad. christianity expanded in the roman empire after 325 ad. christianity did not expand beyond the boundaries of the roman empire by 476 ad
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Where did people move to as the Sahara desert expanded?...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 24.03.2020 02:14
question
Biology, 24.03.2020 02:14
Questions on the website: 13722367