This author is expressing her opinion about — recalling members of Congress impeaching the President disobeying the Supreme Court amending the Constitution

Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:

The great idea in Article V is that change requires two elements: consensus and necessity. There must be substantive national agreement, as well as agreement in most of the states, that an urgent problem exists that cannot be remedied by the courts, legislatures or Congress, and which can be solved only if the Constitution is changed.

—Mary Frances Berry, The New York Times, September 13, 1987

Amending the Constitution

Explanation:

The above text reflects on how the constitution changes through amendments should be. the author of the text shows that the amendments should only be approved when there is a mutual agreement between several factors that prove and justify that there is a problem in society that is impossible to be solved by courts, legislatures or Congress. Furthermore, this problem needs to be solved with such urgency that only an amendment to the constitution, that is, a modification of the constitution can solve it. If this condition were not proposed, the constitution would run the risk of being a set of temporary laws with little or no real influence.

a

explanation:

answer; andrew jackson approved nullification by signing it into law,and john calhoun opposed it saying it was unconstitutional;