Barbot and de las Casas are European, whereas Equiano is African and the Broken Spears are Aztec accounts. How do these differing points of view affect the opinion of each writer? Explain. Is one source more credible than another? Why or why not?

im not sure its either a leader of a group of congresspeople or a person from a congressmans district

sorry im not sure

rain drop drop top my name is nick harris and this is my pawn shop

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.

the answer to your question is true