subject
History, 06.11.2020 08:00 lamooothegoat

What was the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)? A-The Congress cannot use the necessary and proper clause to justify interfering with a state's own laws.

B-The courts have some jurisdiction over legislative redistricting disputes.

C-The Supreme Court can decide if the actions of the other branches of government are
unconstitutional

D-Redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
Write the title date and stated purpose of the map you have chosen to describe what you learn from your careful review of the maps information
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
"the plan of removing the aboriginal people who yet remain within the settled portions of the united states . . approaches its consummation. . an extensive region . . has been assigned for their permanent residence. it has been divided into districts and allotted among them. many have already removed and others are preparing to go. . " removal of southern indians to indian territory, 1835 this passage is most closely related to a) imperialism. b) the civil war. c) westward expansion. d) the french indian war.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:40
Which leader told the israelite people that god would lead them to a “promised land” if they obeyed god faithfully?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
And 100 to 150 words discuss how the american people have responded to a middle eastern independence
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What was the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)? A-The Congress cannot use the necessary and proper c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2020 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722360