Select the correct answer Read these two excerpts from Lincoln's First inaugural Address (Excerpt 1) and Davis's inaugural Address (cerpt) How are the speakers arguments in the excerpts different? Excerpt 1 I hold that, in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution, the Union of these states is perpetual Prime expressed in the fundamental law of all national governments, it is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a po ne organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Construction and there will endur forever--it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument it's self.

Excerpt 2 We have entered upon the career of independence, and it must be inflexibly pursued through many years of coreover wouline associates, the Northern States, we have vainly endeavored to secure tranquillity, and to obtain respect for the rights to where entitled. As a necessity, not a choice, we have resorted to the remedy of separation, and henceforth our energies and be directed to the conduct of our own affairs, and the perpetuity of the Confederacy which we have formed

A One argues for continuing to enslave people, and the other argues for putting an end to the enslavement of people

В. One speaks of the permanent existence of the Union, and the other speaks of the permanent cistence of the Confederacy

C. One describes how a government can destroy itsell, and the other describes how a government can protect itsell

D. One focuses on the independence of governments around the world, and the other focuses on the independence of the Union

d. people are naturally good, and their expressed will is what is best for society

explanation:

pacal the great: the throne was passed on to pacal through a female; as a result, he believed that he must legitimize his claim to the throne to add stability to his reign.

as a result, the daughter of ac kan's brother ruled until her son, pacal, reached an age old enough to assume the throne.

pacal the great became the king of the mayan city of palenque in a different way than most mayan kings.

pacal pointed out that ac kan had succeeded his mother as ruler, thereby establishing a precedent for the rule to pass through a female.  

he tried to justify that the way he gained the throne by connecting his mother with the divine mother and the mythological events that happened during the creation of the world.  

typically, the son of a male mayan ruler inherited the throne, but in 612 ce, king ac kan died and did not leave behind a male heir.

montezuma 1: even so, these wars of conquest failed to provide enough human sacrifices and because of this, he formed a triple alliance with cities in the valley of puebla-tlascala.  

in addition, montezuma realized that his government failed to the aztecs during the famine.

in order to appease him, montezuma increased the number of human sacrifices.

the aztec performed human sacrifices to their god huitzilopotchli because they believed he desired human blood.  

around 1440 ce, montezuma i became the fifth emperor of the aztecs and went on to rule for 28 years.  

soon after he assumed the throne, the aztecs were hit with a series of disasters, namely a plague of locusts, a flood, and a harsh frost  

huayna capac: huayna capac also fought to gain territories north of his empire in what is now ecuador.  

huayna capac significantly extended the inca empire to the south, into what is now argentina and chile.  

in 1493 ce, huayna capac became the eleventh ruler of the inca empire.  

huayna, therefore, wanted to gain his own lands and launched campaigns against tribes to the east and north of the empire.  

the inca empire reached its peak under the rule of huayna capac.

during this time the empire covered a vast territory including parts of present day colombia, peru, argentina, chile, bolivia, and ecuador.

during his reign, huayna heard about bearded men with pale skin that resembled the incan1 god viracocha and took this news as a bad omen.

huayna took this as another bad omen that predicted the destruction of the empire.

we have pictures for proff

they also have books

the crusaders are identified in the painting;

c. by the red crosses on their backs