Based on the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary, what was the position of the United States toward Latin America in the 1800s? aggressive
colonial
belligerent
defensive
PLZZ HELP IM ON A TIMED TEST

Correct answer is defensive.

Explanation:

Defensive is correct answer as both Monroe and Roosevelt believed that their role is to protect countries of Latin America from European imperialism, and that they can intervene there in order to protect countries of Latin America from European countries.

Aggressive is not correct as they didn't exercise any type of aggression towards them.

Colonial is not correct as they were protecting them from colonization.

Belligerent is not correct as it similar to aggressive policy, that they didn't exercise, as we mentioned.

the answer is 250 percent.

explanati“there were many such dangers, in which the odds were all against them. their children were not as well as they had been at home; but how could they know that there was no sewer to their house, and that the drainage of fifteen years was in a cesspool under it? how could they know that the pale-blue milk that they bought around the corner was watered, and doctored with formaldehyde besides? when the children were not well at home, teta elzbieta would gather herbs and cure them; now she was obliged to go to the drugstore and buy extracts–and how was she to know that they were all adulterated? how could they find out that their tea and coffee, their sugar and flour, had been doctored; that their canned peas had been colored with copper salts, and their fruit jams with aniline dyes? and even if they had known it, what good would it have done them, since there was no place within miles of them where any other sort was to be had? the bitter winter was coming, and they had to save money to get more clothing and bedding; but it would not matter in the least how much they saved, they could not get anything to keep them warm. all the clothing that was to be had in the stores was made of cotton and shoddy, which is made by tearing old clothes to pieces and weaving the fiber again. if they paid higher prices, they might get frills and fanciness, or be cheated; but genuine quality they could not obtain for love nor moneyon: