Why would the battle of Stalingrad be considered a turning point in world war 2? A) The soviets began to push westward toward Germany.
B)The Germans controlled the oil fields of the Soviet Union.
C)The Soviet’s would never again be able to mount an offensive effort.
D)The Germans continued to March eastward to meet the Japanese army.

Correct answer is A) The soviets began to push westward toward Germany.

Explanation:

A is the correct answer because Soviets stopped German troops whose goal was to reach the oil fields. Not only they were stopped, but also pushed back and Soviets started moving themselves towards Berlin.

B is not correct as Germans weren't able to gain possession of the oil fields.

C is not correct as the Soviet's started with great operation after this battle, including Bagration.

D is not correct as Germans never managed to connect themselves with Japanese army.

where is the passage?

can't without the passage.

post the full question.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.