A common aspect of many civil rights issues is a discussion of equality of results versus equality of opportunity. Keeping this in mind, evaluate the practice of affirmative action. Use legal precedents to support your conclusions.

I believe that if affirmative action was not in place then many cases would have swayed a different way. One example would be Marco DeFunis Jr. v. Odegaard. Marco was a white man who applied to the University of Washington Law School, but was denied because the school "prioritized admitting minority students who were less qualified." He sued a state education official and successfully gained admission to the school. While his case was considered "moot," there have been many cases afterward based upon race and admissions to schools which were ruled that the schools could in fact deny admission based on race. Some of the schools use this to bring in money because with a more diverse student environment there are more different people who are willing to sponsor that are in a high economic class.

Explanation:

a politically correct answer.

northernmost part (disputed, administered) - near indira col, siachen glacier - 35.674520°n 76.845245°e

northernmost part (disputed, claimed) - dafdar near beyik pass - 37°24′00″n 75°24′00″e

northernmost part (undisputed) - near dharwas, chambal district - 33.24902°n 76.82704°e

southernmost part (mainland) - cape comorin - 8.06890°n 77.55230°e

southernmost part - indira point in the nicobar islands - 6.74678°n 93.84260°e

distance between:  

1 & 4 - 3070 km

1 & 5 - 3654 km

2 & 4 - 3269 km

2 & 5 - 3885 km

3 & 4 - 2801 km

3 & 5 - 3430 km

explanation:

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this