"[The city's engineers excelled in areas] neglected by the Greeks, such as the construction of roads and aqueducts, and of sewers that could wash the filth of the city into the Tiber. They have built paved
roads throughout the country, leveling ridges and filling up hollows, so as to make possible the
movements of heavily loaded wagons. . . . And such is the quantity of water brought in by the
aqueducts, that veritable rivers flow through the city and its sewers: almost every house has cisterns,
waterpipes, and copious fountains."
—Strabo, as quoted in
Empires Ascendant: Time Frame 400 B. C.-AD. 200
Where did the sewage of Rome finally end up?
a. in the aqueducts
b. in the sewers
C. in the Tiber
d. in heavily loaded wagons

ok, but what is your question? as soon as you tell me i will answer your question : )

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

i would have to say i believe that it is a.