This speech was received with enthusiastic applause and cheers by the convention goers. Based on the content of the speech, how do you think
the audience may have felt about big business. (Use evidence from the
speech to justify your response.)

Based on the content of the speech,I think  the way the audience would have felt about big business is:

According to the given question, we are asked to show the feelings of the audience about the given speech and their thoughts about big businesses by the end of the speech.

As a result of this, we can see that based on the context of the speech, the narrator talks about the two different business, and although they differ in size, they are both equal because of the toil both of them make towards becoming successful.

From the excerpt, ""The merchant at the corner store is as much a businessman as the merchant of New York. The farmer who goes forth in the morning and toils all day"

Read more here:

link

Based on the content of the speech, the audience will feel that big businesses are equal to small businesses; showing that since it is business and toiling that they are all doing, they are equal.

From the excerpt, the speaker said:

"The merchant at the corner store is as much a businessman as the merchant of New York. The farmer who goes forth in the morning and toils all day... is as much a businessman as the man who works on Wall Street."

Explanation:

From excerpt, the speaker speaks persuasively to his audience. He reveals that the farmer that toils and the merchant in Wall Street are all businessmen. This shows that the poor businessmen were neglected and big businessmen were given attention. They tend to set standards that will benefit big businesses and downplay the poor and small businesses. The speaker makes it clear that the toiling masses must be considered and not neglected.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.