Imagine you operated a shipping and packaging service within New York City. You slowly expanded to include shipments and deliveries between New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. After the expansion, could you be subject to regulation by either or all of the states and the federal government? Which court case outlines this? Explain your answer. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) , McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) , Marbury v. Madison (1803)

You would be outlined to regulation by the federal government. The court case that outlined this is the Gibbons V. Ogden case of 1824.

The Gibbons V. Ogden case was one whereby the supreme court of the US upheld that the states in the country cannot interfere with the power of the federal government to regulate commerce in the country.

In this case, Ogden had asked the court to prevent Gibbons from operating in the state waters for commerce. According to him, he had exclusive rights to the waters.

This case went to prove that the federal government had more power over the states in the country.

Read more on link

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824).

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden of 1824 was a historic decision that determined the power of the federal government to regulate interstate commerce in the nation, superimposing itself on the rights and powers of the states in this matter.

In the case, it was a commercial matter between two concessionaires of river routes, one of which had a monopoly on the concession from the State of New York, while the other had a permit issued by the Federal Government. Finally, the Supreme Court established that the states could not limit interstate commerce, especially when there was a permit or license granted by the Federal Government itself.

the answer is to stop cheating on plato

bujías y una hora antes y no me parece muy difícil