Which of the following statements best describes the general process of how laws are made in the United States?

Options:

A law is created by Congress, signed by the president, and interpreted by the courts.

A law is created by the president, signed by the courts, and interpreted by Congress.

A law is created by the courts, signed by the president, and interpreted by Congress.

A law is created by the president, signed by Congress, and interpreted by the courts.

A law is created by Congress, signed by the president, and interpreted by the courts.

Explanation:

The general process of how laws are made in the United States is considering a law that is created by  Congress, then the created law must be signed by the president and interpreted by the courts.

Before Congress, the beginning of the law is starting with the idea that someone is proposing. Anyone can make the idea but that idea must be shown to a lawmaker of the United States. After that, lawmaker is deciding on the legislation of the idea and that idea can be developed through a written proposal. Then, there is comes Congress and the members of it which is leading the idea to the president and court.

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation:

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.