Which group followed a code of chivalry?

Knights Code of Chivalry. More often than not, Chivalry was associated with knighthood. The Code of Chivalry was the code of conduct followed by the knights during the medieval period. It was developed between the 11th and 12th century.

Knights

Explanation:

Knights Code of Chivalry. More often than not, Chivalry was associated with knighthood. The Code of Chivalry was the code of conduct followed by the knights during the medieval period. It was developed between the 11th and 12th century.medieval code of chivalry however, arose from the idealization brought by the synthesis of Germanic and Roman medieval martial traditions that often involved military bravery, training, and service to others.

Yet according to common definitions, the Code of Chivalry was simply the rules and customs of medieval knights. Others defined it as the qualifications of a knight. These qualifications included virtues of courtesy, generosity and valor.

Knights Code of Chivalry in Dark Ages

The Knights Code of Chivalry was prevalent during the dark ages and everyone understood what it entailed. There was not an actual code so to speak. However, the code of chivalry during the medieval era was understood to be a set of rules that were beyond combat.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: