How does it seem the audience justifies people being thrown to the animals in the gladiatorial combat in Ancient Rome. I

The audience justified this because the vast majority of gladiators were slaves, and slaves, in Ancient Roman society, were not considered people worthy of civil, political, or personal rights, they were essentially property.

These slaves were mostly taken from the frontiers of the Roman Empire, where constant warfare generated a steady supply of slaves. The strongest were to become gladiators, while others were to be worked in farms, or in domestic households.

In general terms, Ancient Roman society largely depended on slavery to work property, it was considered to be a slave society.

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.  

democracy

explanation: