In the space provided, compare and contrast the Puritan governments of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Evaluate the effectiveness of each form of government, as well as the lasting impact each had on American democracy. I need this done Asap
2-3 sentances

=> The Puritan government of Massachusetts was neither a democracy nor a theocracy. Massachusetts had aspects of both. The religious laws were  dominant over most laws in the state. However, they didn't have one ruler. The only people who could vote were the "freemens."✨✨

   The Puritan government of Connecticut  was controlled by King Charles II of England. He gave the governor the "executive" power. Puritan was the only religion allowed. It was part of an extended monarchy as well.✨✨

khdkajd; lkad 'lk; aldkdjladkjkldhla

explanation:

hadkhadkhapkldjlkajdlfja

health care plans in the united states having high costs because they are focusing on providing quality programs for different groups of individuals. the quality of the service is based on money flow received from the members. without this investment, couldn't be possible a constant scientific searching to prevent death and illness caused because of low levels of health investigation. currently, the complaints are not about the highest cost, but about the coverage and benefits to access the necessary health services required by the members.  

besides, if a global health system is established the quality levels will fall down because of the standardized of the health. the access to care will increase but the quality will be low because it depends on the money invested.