In your opinion, which style of jury selection would be more fair... Jury picked by lot or Jury picked by Voire Dire? Please explain your answer.

see exp :)

Explanation:

In my opinion, Jury picked by lot is a much much fair-er way of choosing a jury. When you pick by random, the people don't have any attachment to the person being tried. if you picked people on both sides, you'd get people which are biased, which is just human nature. so in short, Jury picked by lot is a much better way.

i really really really really really really dont know

thomas jefferson is the answer