John Locke v. Thomas Hobbes?
one paragraph

Explanation:

Hobbes theory of Social Contract supports absolute sovereign without giving any value to individuals, while Locke and Rousseau supports individual than the state or the government. ... He rules out a representative form of government. But, Locke does not make any such distinction. Locke also believed in social contract theory, yet, whereas Hobbes believed the monarch gained unlimited power once that initial contract was implicitly recognized, Locke claimed the social contract between a monarch and his subjects was supposed to be continuously scrutinized. Hobbes argued for royal absolutism, while Locke argued for constitutionalism. overthrown, while Locke believed that if the social contract is violated, the governed have the right to overthrow the government. Hobbes backed the king, while Locke backed Parliament in the English Civil War.

the melanesian is basically practicing magic.

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."