One of the most divisive and economically pressing questions in U. S. domestic policy over the last several decades has been healthcare. The United States spends
twice as much in terms of Gross Domestic Product on healthcare as the next
biggest spender in the advanced world, and yet our average lifespan is less than
most of the countries on the list. The debate in the U. S. is over whether or not
healthcare should be a part our larger commercial system, and hence accessed
through private insurers giving the consumer more "choice," or whether healthcare
access should be guaranteed to all through either a hybrid public/private system
(like Obamacare) or a more robust public system in which healthcare is guaranteed
to all residents through a government-run healthcare program, with a potential
downside of having less "choice" in such a system. Public polling suggests that there
is no bigger public policy issue that Americans care about as much as healthcare at
this point in our nation's history. For the discussion, which of the various options
listed above (or options that you have researched on your own) do you support as
the way forward for the American healthcare system? Explain your answer, arguing
for its superiority over the other options.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

originally he was supposed to be dead but they wanted to continue the series so they brought him back to life.

we need to see the passage before we can do anything further.   give me brainliest