Andrew Jackson was different from Thomas Jefferson in what way?
A. Jackson strongly opposed the concept and use of nullification.
B. Jackson saw and promoted himself as a man of the people.
C. His policies supported the contributions of American Indians.
D. Jackson avoided using the power of the veto during his era.
E. Jackson did not oppose slavery.

I believe the correct answer for this is A. Jackson strongly opposed the concept and use of nullification.

Explanation:

Jefferson was the one who set forth the idea of nullification while Jackson was strongly opposed to this idea, so that is why I think it is A.

Yes, Jackson saw himself as a "common man" who tried to make a government for the people, but Jefferson accepted this thought, so it is NOT B.

It is NOT C because Jackson did not support anything from the Indians. He wanted them gone. One definition of contribution is the part played by a person or thing in bringing about a result or helping something to advance. Jackson did not want to help them advance. Jefferson was the one who was more for Indians. He wanted them to assimilate and become US citizens.

It is NOT D because it's just not true. He did veto things. One example is that he vetoed the bill to reauthorize the Bank. Jefferson was the one that did not veto anything.

And lastly, it is NOT E because while Jackson did not oppose slavery, Jefferson had slaves himself, so this is true, but it is not what we're looking for.

~Kicho [nm68]

a woodchuck would chuck 12.5 wood : 3