What did Jefferson in his Declaration of Independence blame England for doing with Indians?

Declaration of Independence states that all people are equivalent and should exercise equal privileges, liberties and happiness, government should safeguard citizen rights.

The correct answer is:

Option b. Enrolling them to combat with the British against the Americans.

This can be explained as:

Therefore, England was blamed for enlisting Indians to fight against Americans.

To learn more about the Declaration of Independence follow the link:

link

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

What did Jefferson in his Declaration of Independence blame England for doing with Indians?

a.  killing them

b.  enlisting them to fight with the British against the Americans

c.  enticing them to ally with the French government

d.  encouraging them to join American patriot forces in the Borderlands

Jefferson accused England of:

b.  enlisting them to fight with the British against the Americans

Explanation:

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

According to the Declaration of Independence, Native Americans were approached by the British, who wanted them to fight against the Americans. By "he", the speaker is referring to King George III. As we can see in the excerpt above, Native Americans were portrayed as savages who made no distinction between men, women, and children, killing all people. However, it is important to note here that many Indian nations tried to stay out of the conflict.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!