Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage? A. The Osage were forced to leave homelands in the Southeast and move to the Indian Territory
B. Treaties caused the Osage to cede most of their land in Arkansas and Missouri,
C. Wars broke out between the Osage and tribes that were brought to the Indian Territory
D. The Osage eventually were removed from the Indian Territory and taken to Kansas,

A.

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma. This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans.

Thus the correct option is A.

maybe you need to work on the pipes in the house. i am just saying this because you did not give any details.

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho