According to Madison, how does the larger number of voters lead to a better class of representatives?

Madison believed that a larger number of voters would ensure that elected candidates were the best versions of the elected.

Both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton wrote the federalist papers where they outlined why they supported the new Constitution and in particular, the need for popular democracy.

According to them, a larger number of voters would ensure that:

We can therefore conclude that Madison believed that the quality of representatives produced by a democracy depended on whether the representative was able to appeal to many people as opposed to a few.

Find out more at link.

For Madison, the greater number of voters decreases the chances of an unworthy candidate to plague the population and be elected.

Explanation:

For Madison, a larger number of voters limits the chances of an unworthy and lying candidate to come to power. This is because a larger number of voters promote a large group, where the diversity of thoughts and needs is prevalent. As a result, candidates need to be worthy in many different ways, in order for this group to agree with it, in most members. This effort that must be made by the candidates ends up eliminating those who are unworthy of the competition, in addition, a large group of voters is more difficult to deceive.

churchill warned that the soviet union had cut eastern europe off from the west with an "iron curtain."

give me brainliest

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.