In westside community schools v. mergens, the supreme court ruled in favor of the stating that it was a violation of
a.
principal . . church and state
b.
students . . their first amendment rights
c.
students . . their patriotic rights
d.
principal . . school policy

B. students . . . their First Amendment rights.

Explanation:

In the case Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens (1990) the Supreme Court discussed a school's ability to hold classes of Bible study after school. The main concern was with the payment of a sponsor, as this was seen as constituting an endorsement of religion on the part of the school. In the end, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students, stating that this was a violation of their First Amendment rights, and declaring that the club was allowed to hold meetings, but that the sponsor could not be paid.

the lowest among the social higher rank were the working class. this class remained detached to the political progression   of the country and was hostile to the other two classes

health care plans in the united states having high costs because they are focusing on providing quality programs for different groups of individuals. the quality of the service is based on money flow received from the members. without this investment, couldn't be possible a constant scientific searching to prevent death and illness caused because of low levels of health investigation. currently, the complaints are not about the highest cost, but about the coverage and benefits to access the necessary health services required by the members.  

besides, if a global health system is established the quality levels will fall down because of the standardized of the health. the access to care will increase but the quality will be low because it depends on the money invested.