PLEASE ANSWER FAST A LOT OF POINTS What is difference in the perspectives of American and Cubans in regards to the Battle of San Juan Hill?

The correct answer to this open question was the following.

The difference in the perspectives of Americans and Cubans in regards to the Battle of San Juan Hill is that the Cubans were tired of the Spanish monarchy presence in the Island of Cuba, but had no means to get rid of the Spaniards and its powerful army. The American point of view was that the United States had the exclusive right to intervene and take care of the issues in the American continent, not the Europeans, that is why the First US Voluntary Cavalry, led by Theodore Roosevelt, tried to recapture Santiago de Cuba. To accomplish this, they had to fight a severe resistance in the Battle of San Juan Hill on July 1, 1898.

answer; ///i do believe that the correct answer is (b) ///middle colony

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is