Which of the following is not an important difference between the Mauryan and Gupta Empires? Question 21 options: The Gupta Empire produced more extant (still existing) art and literature. The Mauryan Empire did not last as long as the Gupta Empire did. One of the Mauryan rulers’ kingly dharma was most heavily influenced by Buddhist principles.

The Mauryan Empire did not last as long as the Gupta Empire did.

Explanation:

              The Mauryan Empire was one of the first empires of India which was founded by the great Chandragupta Maurya  around 321 BC. While the Gupta Dynasty was found by the great Gupta ruler,  Chandra Gupta - I. He was well known as the "King of the kings".

            It is evident that the art and literature of the Gupta empire is more extant including the fields like art,  science, culture, Astronomy, astrology, literature,  famous wall paintings etc. The Gupta period is   known as the "Golden Period" in Indian history.

           Ashoka, was the third great ruler of the Mauryan dynasty. He was great follower of Buddhism. The Mauryan rulers followed greatly the Buddhist faiths and their principles.                                          

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.