Why did the framers of the Constitution believe that the prosperity of the nation depended on a free enterprise system? a. They believed that in a free enterprise system, the government would be able to play a major role in
people's lives and help new businesses thrive and compete in a global marketplace.
b. They believed that in a free enterprise system, people would be free to make their own laws and
regulations and that this would stimulate the economy.
C. They believed that in a free enterprise system, state governments would be better able to control the
economy than the federal government would because states better understood their citizens' needs.
d. They believed that in a free enterprise system, government played a limited role in the economy,
and Americans would thrive when left to individual enterprise.

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction

The majority of victories and progress made by the women’s suffrage movement in the late 19th and early 20th centuries came from the industrialized north the denizens of the east the american west the reconstructed south

Match each form of japanese art with its description