What conflicts were at the heart of constitutional debates between federalists and anti-federalists?

The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people.

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government way too much power. Also without the Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.

Explanation:

There were quite a few conflicts at the heart of constitutional debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The ten constitutional amendments and the Bill or Rights caused many arguments between the two. Federalists supported a central government, which would keep order easier. They claimed the Union was in danger of falling apart, that constitutions checks and balanced would preserve the states rights. Federalists endorsed the common law system, which was described by Blackstone. Anti-Federalist's supported the state governments, instead of a central one. A limited, streamlined government was preferred. They claimed the Constitution gave the government way too much power. They also claimed that the Articles of Confederation could be updated. Anti-Federalists opposed to the quartering of federal troops in civilian homes.