As an archaeologist, you spend a lot of your summers digging around in the sands of the Middle East, trying not to broil in the heat and occasionally finding fragments of
cultures long dead and gone. You stumble across a collection of artifacts one day that
promise to make you as famous as Indiana Jones...if you can interpret what they
actually meant. The find is a skeleton, buried with the remains of implements of war (a
shield, a spear) and what appears to be two wheels. Clutched in the warrior's hand is a
stone tablet, inscribed in cuneiform, that describes an ancient city of unknown name
raising a ziggurat in order to beseech the gods for help in a great battle yet to come.
National Geographic is coming to interview you on the find, and they'll want to know
what it actually means: Tell the cameras all you know, or think you know, about the
artifacts you've found and how they would have connected to their world.

¿cual es tu pregunta?

Explanation:

Deverias ser mas especifico

a and c?

i think it is a and c

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.