subject
History, 28.08.2020 06:01 sethjohnson386pbnm3x

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? O Their action did not negatively influence other students.
Their action was not disruptive.
Their action occurred off school grounds.
* Their action was political speech.

THE ANSWER IS B, ALL OF THE OTHER ANSWERS THAT THEY SAY IT IS D THEY ARE WRONG, hope this helps :)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
The incas used quipus to options -preserve there history -keep records of people and goods -decide when to plant crops -decide work amoung peasant familys
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
How did the feudal rights of nobles limit government both in england and in germany?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:30
Why was buddhismespecially attractive to the lower jati and untouchables?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 17:00
Define these terms in your own words bessemer process louis pasteur adam smith karl marx capitalism nation-state popular sovereignty congress of vienna otto von bismarck pogrom serfs
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
History, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
History, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
World Languages, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
German, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
World Languages, 15.02.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367