After Saddam Hussein’s forces were defeated in Iraq and driven from Kuwait, US and Allied leaders had a decision to make. Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who victimized his own people and was proven to be willing to engage in warlike activities with neighboring nations. At the same time, the people of Iraq were divided along religious and ethnic lines. Without a strong leader, the country might devolve into chaos. US leaders decided to keep Saddam Hussein in charge of Iraq with severe limits on Iraq’s military. It was thought that the instability that might rise without a strong leader in Iraq was worse than Hussein’s brutal rule. Put yourself in the difficult position of making the decision as to whether to remove a dictator from control of an unstable country. What arguments could be made for removing the dictator? What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power? For keeping the dictator: ~The chaos that surrounds an unstable nation without a strong leader could lead to widespread civil war. ~Terrorist groups could come to power without a strong central government. For removing the dictator: ~The dictator should be stopped from harming his own people and others. ~Allowing the dictator to stay in power might encourage others in the world to act in horrible ways to gain power. ~The people of the nation might now be free to decide their own form of government.