What is a difference between interpreting timelines and interpreting historical narratives?

the analysis done is on dates, times and places, very specific information, and their organization throughout time. Whereas in historical narratives, you can analyze dates, but what you do mostly is analyze the in-depth information on an event that took place under a specific time, or place.

Explanation:

A historical timeline, as mentioned before, has the specific purpose of showing the timeframe, and order, in which events during a specific period, took place. There is no deeped analysis on the information, but very superficial. However, in narratives, what the analyzer does is too look with much more emphasis on the details, and specific information, regarding a historical event, or historical narration, of an event. This is the main difference between timelines and hisorical narratives.

Explanation:

i belive the classic sword and a shield would do

i know social security wasn't one.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!