Read the timeline and answer the question that follows: Timeline: Women’s Rights 1848: The world's first women's rights convention is held in Seneca Falls, N. Y., July 19–20. 1909: Women garment workers strike in New York for better wages and working conditions. 1968: Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) is first black woman elected to the U. S. Congress. 1974: MANA, the Mexican-American Women's National Association, organizes as feminist activist organization. By 1990, MANA chapters operate in 16 states; members in 36. 1995: United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women—Beijing, China. 2000: U. N. General Assembly Special Session, "Women 2000: Gender, Equality, Development and Peace for the 21st Century." 2003: Amnesty International issued a report called Intolerable Killings: 10 Years of Abductions and Murders of Women in Ciudad Juárez and Chihuahua, highlighting the pattern of killings and abductions of women in the two Mexican border cities. According to the timeline, would it be reasonable to assume that all women will have rights equal to men in the next decade? A. No, rights for women have progressed, but women still face hardships in many parts of the world. B. Yes, the timeline indicates consistent rapid, forward movement toward equality for women. C. No, women’s rights have not progressed significantly since the mid-1800s.

c would be the correct !

hope this !

~bbgluver

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

offline recommendation systems option b

because recommendation systems produce a list of two ways

1. through collaborative filtering

or

2. through content-based filtering

1. temperance, abolitionist, suffragist