What is the most likely moral of this parable? A. When it comes to conflict and hostility, there are never any true

winners

B. Money is useful, but it cannot buy everything a person needs in the

world

C. Lawsuits are won by those who know how to work smarter, not

harder

D. In time death conquers all, even those who are wealthy and

successful

Moral:

A  a conflict doesn´t solve anything; only dialogue does because there will be two winners instead of none.

B such as immaterial things

C Use your brain instead of your body

D Be sure not to live your life aiming at wealth and success

Explanation:

A In war or in personal conflicts with people who we care for, we should be always aware that we can´t really win a conflict, because the price for our 'victory' is a disturbed relationship with the other person/country.

B The immaterial things like love, friendship, happiness.

C Anything you do, you always should try to do it the smart way without exhausting yourself in hard labor.

D No matter how much material wealth we pursue, in the end it means nothing.

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.

thtrhthtrrththtrhrt

step-by-step explanation: