Mapp v Ohio (1961), Gideon v Wainwright (1963), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) are all Supreme Court decisions that strengthened individual rights by 1increasing protections for persons accused of crimes
2eliminating restrictions on gun ownership
3overturning racial segregation laws
4encouraging greater voter participation in government

1: increasing protections for persons accused of crimes

Explanation:

Mapp resulted in the use of evidence found by unreasonable search and seizure being inadmissible in court as a violation of the 4th amendment.

Gideon resulted in the legal mandate of the courts providing legal counsel to defendents who cannot afford to hire representation.

Miranda resulted in the Miranda rights that are read to one when being arrested, such as you have the right to remain silent, and confessions given under interrogation without being told they can consult legal counsel,  will not be usable in court

the hollywood film industry of 1950 was threatened on several different fronts. television broadcasting was rapidly becoming the dominant entertainment medium in the united states. the paramount anti-trust consent decree requiring separate ownership for production companies and theater chains had gone into effect on 1 january 1950. large numbers of young men and women were marrying, having children, and moving to the suburbs, which affected the viability of downtown first-run movie theaters. foreign revenues were endangered by protectionist tactics including quota systems, high taxes, and blocked funds. finally, the morality and patriotism of hollywood films and filmmakers were under attack from government, religious, and citizens' groups.

explanation: