What is the most significant limitation that Carl Schurz’s work has, as a resource for a historian? He was not an eyewitness to the events he describes. He was too young to be a reliable witness. He was an employee of the government and likely biased against the revolutionaries. He wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.

He wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.

Explanation:

Carl Christian Schurz was a statesman, writer, and reformer of the United States. Following the German revolution of 1848, he moved to the United States and was made a leading member of the emerging Republican Party. He published several writings, including a two-volume biography of Henry Clay (1887), a volume of speeches (1865), and his Reminiscences (1907–09). As per the question, his works limitation lies in the gap of the timeframe when the actual event occurred and when he finally wrote it down.

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (a); ///the crystal will

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

hope this : )