Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the
aggressor - never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he
or she feels forgotten. The political prisoner in his cell, the hungry
children, the homeless refugees - not to respond to their plight,
not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope is to
exile them from human memory. And in denying their humanity,
we betray our own.
Which part of this excerpt best contributes to Wiesel's central argument that it is
wrong to be indifferent to human suffering?
A. The political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless
refugees
B. And in denying their humanity, we betray our own
C. Suffering is never relieved by indifference,
Ο Ο
D. Indifference elicits no response.

C

Explanation:

That is why its wrong to be indifferent.

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."

because it’s really sad that’s why it’s in history native americans getting kicked out of their homeland.