One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
Group of answer choices
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
How were slavery and indentured labor in american colonies similar
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Approximately how many americans, from both the north and the south, were killed in battle during the civil war?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
The political viewpoint of a newspaper can be learned by reading the comics front page sports section editorial page
Answers: 3
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 10:30
History, 14.07.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 10:30