Consider the function of the US Supreme Court building. Why might architects have used Roman and Greek architectural influences to construct the US Supreme Court building, as well as other government buildings? Write a 75- to 100-word analysis of these influences.

Durability, elagant style and innovation of new materials.

Explanation:

It should be understood that during the time of construction of the US supreme court, the Roman and Greek engineers were considered to be the best. This is because of their creativity in constructing elegant structures that stand the test of time.

This is the reason why the Roman and the Greek engineers were contacted when the supreme court building was to be built.

These engineers make use of new materials, particularly concrete, and newer technologies such as the arch and the dome to make buildings, which were typically strong and well-engineered.

And that is the reason why that, most of those buildings are still standing and meeting the standard of this new age or era.

Explanation:

The US government operates on the concept of democracy, which the ancient Greeks developed. The US government also borrows many other ideas about politics and government from ancient Greece and Rome. The architects of the modern government buildings probably wanted to acknowledge the role ancient Greece and Rome played in shaping the United States’ political identity. That may be why they used Greek and Roman architectural influences when designing structures such as the US Supreme Court building.

answer: a parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. in a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. this is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as the united kingdom, denmark, sweden, and japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president is the head of state while the head of government is regularly from the legislature (such as ireland, germany, india, and italy). in a few parliamentary republics, such as botswana, south africa, and suriname, among some others, the head of government is also head of state, but is elected by and is answerable to parliament. in bicameral parliaments, the head of government is generally, though not always, a member of the lower house.

parliamentarianism is the dominant form of government in europe, with 32 of its 50 sovereign states being parliamentarian. it is also common in the caribbean, being the form of government of 10 of its 13 island states, and in oceania. elsewhere in the world, parliamentary countries are less common, but they are distributed through all continents, most often in former colonies of the british empire that subscribe to a particular brand of parliamentarianism known as the westminster system.

explanation: