Why is the prime minister of India considered to be the true leader of India, while the president of India is

considered to be the ceremonial head of state?

Because while the president of India is formally the head of state, and the commander of the armed forces, the president does not have any actual power, and his role is ceremonial.

Explanation:

It is the prime minister of India who has real power, and who actually commands the armed forces, and governs the country.

This is why India has what is known as a parliamentary system: the head of government, who has executive power, is the prime minister, who comes from the party with the largest amount of seats in the parliament.

This system is inherited from Britain, where it was first developed. In fact, the president of India is the equivalent to the Queen of Britian. They are heads of state, but they do not hold any real power.

a. because the u.s. was the leading with the most technology, economy, etc. also was teamed with other allies witch boosted the economy and materials to improve technology and use it.

the answer is c. they believed the royal family should hold all the power.