subject
History, 05.05.2020 22:34 ngmasuku3115

To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Because of the lack of resolution after World War I, there is nothing world
leaders could have done to avoid World War II.
O
Strongly agree. Simply put, World War II was inevitable.
Somewhat agree. Europe was left in ruins and susceptible to
another world war, but perhaps leaders could have done more
to help Europe recover.
O
Disagree. Despite the destruction caused by the war, world
leaders should have done more to create systems of
cooperation and peace.
O
Unsure. I don't feel I know enough yet about the events that
happened between the world wars to answer this question.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Which of the following wars was the most devastating to oklahoma? a. american revolution b. mexican-american war c. civil war d. world war i
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:50
What was a common experience for working-class families during the industrial revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:00
Why did the treaty of paris strain the american alliance with the french? 1.the french had expected to control the negotiations. 2.the french were upset with the generous boundaries granted to the united states. 3.the french lost many of their colonies in the negotiations. 4. the french had supported the british throughout the war.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:00
What is an important similarity between the way scientists were thinking during the scientific revolution and the way philosophers were thinking during the enlightenment?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Because of the lack of resolution after World...
Questions
question
World Languages, 29.03.2020 13:48
question
Computers and Technology, 29.03.2020 13:49
question
Mathematics, 29.03.2020 13:49
question
Mathematics, 29.03.2020 13:56
question
Mathematics, 29.03.2020 14:09
Questions on the website: 13722367