What actions were taken as "clear indicators" of U. S. post war position? (Nokilov Telegram)

Rapid expanse of a peacetime army to 1 million people

Creation of a system of naval and air bases in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans

Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries

All of these actions were seen as examples

Hello There Again. The correct answer C. Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries.

Explanation:

Because of The Russian  Russia had ever

known before. This achievement and its ensuing results led to the emergence

of the Soviet Union as a military superpower. In this capacity, the Soviet

Union was able to project its power to a degree unparalleled in Russian

history-a transformation with immense potential. This broad view focused

the examination of the symposium’s various topics and themes, orally in

presentations and discussions, and then more fully in the essays of this

volume, composed prior to the symposium and refiied in its wake.

All historical records are incomplete and these proceedings are an

imperfect record. The introductions and commentaries exhibit some discontinuities because their authors did not see the revised versions of the papers

contained in this volume. The members of the inti~~ti~nal panelwhich

closed the symposium commented only briefly because of time limitations,

but subsequently submitted the written observations in this volume. Discussions with the audience at the symposium’s sessions and the banquet presentation by Brig. Gen. Roland Lajoie, USA, on “The Soviet Fignting Man” are

not included here because of space limitations. They must remain the special

pleasure, benefit, and memory of the symposium’s participants.

What distinguishes this book from others in Soviet studies and Russian

military history? In Soviet studies a plethora of books and articles on military issues exists in a contemporary framework from the vantage points of

national security and international relations. Very few are written in the historical perspective. In Western writing on Russian military history, the

number of historians and uniformed specialists recognized as truly outstanding is surprisingly limited- fact which became forcefully evident to

the symposium’s organizers as they combed Germany, France, Great Britain,

and the United Stam for qualified contributors. This volume views the subject historically and may be unique in its combination of overall program,

individual connibutions, and suggestions for future research. In the structure

of its program it is a survey of modern Russian military history. In its individual contributions it provides a good bit of specialized “post-holing.” It

possesses a pragmatic, professional military view in having sought out contributions by qualified military contributors and in providing a bibliographical aid. This aid is a significant indicator of the current professional

level of Soviet military studies in the West, offering military specialists,

scholars, and graduate students a readily accessible tool for further research

and study. The Great Patriotic War demonstrated both capabilities and deficiencies

in Soviet society, many still unexplored by Western specialists. The ability

of the Soviet Union to sustain itself in the face of extraordmxy losses and

destruction is indisputable. Why this was true is less cIear. It may be that

this was the major contribution of the Communist Party, but the issue remains

unestablished, at least in Western minds. This question is related to one of

the symposium’s major gaps, the question of the role of the “rear” or the

“homefront” in Russian wars and in particular in World War II. The poverty

of Westem scholarship on the Russian and Soviet ‘‘mar’’ caused planners for

the Academy’s 1982 military history symposium to leave out Russia and the

Soviet Union altogether at that symposium, which was devoted to the subject. Hope it helps!

to oppose fdr’s new deal

explanation:

the american liberty league. the american liberty league was a nonpartisan organization formed in 1934 in opposition to the new deal. the organization's stated goal was “to defend the constitution and defend the rights and liberties guaranteed by that constitution.”

1st amendment: freedom of speech, religion, petition, press, and assembly

2nd: right to bear arms

3rd: quartering of soldiers

4th: search and seizure