Describe the difference of views between the North and South on the Dred Scott court case.

The ruling in Dred Scott v Sanford, issued in 1857 by the United States Supreme Court, was one of the Court's most contentious cases regarding the status of slaves and their citizenship in America.

Basically, the ruling confirmed the position held by the slave owners, which established that they were property and not human with American citizenship, with which they could not claim before the Court under any circumstances.

The ruling caused even more divisions in the already convulsed American society regarding the issue of slavery. In the North, whose society was largely abolitionist and where large numbers of states had already banned slavery, the ruling was seen as shame and disrespect for the human condition. In the South, by contrast, the ruling was seen as a triumph of property system and a confirmation of the supposed essential difference between the white man and the black man.

pinterest: xxxsociety (if anyone sees this follow me on there xd)

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.