Drag the characteristic into the correct column in the table to show whether it is associated with the White Army or the Red Army. White Army Red Army 1.This army recived support drom the west 2. Leon trotsky led this army 3.some of the people in the army wanted a democracy 4.this army crused all its opposition 5.this army achieved power and victory in russia 6.this army was made up a variety of different interests

White Army:

1. This army received support from the west.

The White Army was made up of generally anti-communist groups, which was the beliefs of the Western-world, leading to the eventual support. However, with corruption plaguing the white government(s), these support was not put into good use.

3. Some of the people in the army wanted a democracy.

Remember, the groups in the white army are just anti-communist. Their individual ideals of what form of government they want is completely different, as some groups may want to reinstate the royal family, others want a direct democracy or even indirect democracy, and others.

6. This army was made up of a variety of different interests.

This point piggy-backs off the 3rd choice.

Red Army:

2. Leon Trotsky led this army.

Leon Trotsky was a early leader in the Russian Communist Political Party, which led to his major influence in leading any actions that the Party takes.

4. This army crushed all its oppositions.

Without the white armies actually uniting, the Red army was able to unify more structurally and take out each individual white army.

5. This army achieved power and victory in Russia.

As seen in the history of Russia, after the war between the Red & White Armies, Russia became known as the U.S.S.R, under the communist regime.

~

answer: hamilton

explanation:

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.