subject
History, 06.05.2020 01:57 jesseemartinez22

Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of korematsu’s internment?

A) due to the war, there was not enough time to hold trials or hearing before sending people to internment camp

B) the military had a legitimate need to protect against espionage and sabotage

C) korematsu had been provean a Japanese soy and a threat to national security

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Were african-americans allowed to serve in the military in wwi?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
All of the following were weaknesses of the articles of confederation, except: a) the central government was not permitted to regulate state, interstate, or foreign trade. b) the central government was not permitted to borrow money. c) the central government had little ability to regulate money. d) the central government had no ability to tax.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What was a cause of the boer war? a. conflicts between boers and bantu c. disputes over land ownership b. conflicts over water rights d. desire to control the region's mineral wealth select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Morgan is dividing 2 by 18. what will keep repeating in the quotient?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of korematsu’s internm...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363