Why do you think slave owners prevent slaves from gathering in large groups?

I think it is probably because they were afraid that the slaves would gather around and come up with a plan for either a revolt or an escape. Both of these were not good (in the mindset of a slave owner) because he would lose his slaves, or get a complete revolt in which there would be a lot of trouble and a lot less time for them to work.

This isn't a terrific explanation but I hope it helps, just build on top of the key points and I think you'll be all set.

Hope it helps!

Explanation:

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

i'm asking the same thing i asked this other cat all of