Help me answer these 3 short answer questions in 3-5 sentences

1. Explain the historical circumstances that led to Napoleon’s rise and consolidation of power in the early 19th century.

2. Explain H. G. Wells’ Point of view concerning the career of Napoleon Bonaparte.

3. Identify a similarity and difference regarding the career of Napoleon Bonaparte.

(I NEED IT)

look at the explanations

Explanation:

1. he walked into the room with a bunch of soldiers, and through the military dissolved the Directory and created himself the Consul of France.

2. He saw him as the most illuminating figures in modern history.

3. i do not know sorry

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.